Haoqiang Wang, Yiwei Fang (Institute of Information Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences; School of Cyber Security, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences; Indiana University Bloomington), Yichen Liu (Indiana University Bloomington), Ze Jin (Institute of Information Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences; School of Cyber Security, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences; Indiana University Bloomington), Emma Delph (Indiana University Bloomington), Xiaojiang Du (Stevens Institute of Technology), Qixu Liu (Institute of Information Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences; School of Cyber Security, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences), Luyi Xing (Indiana University Bloomington)

Matter is emerging as an IoT industry–unifying standard, aiming to enhance the interoperability among diverse smart home products, enabling them to work securely and seamlessly together. With many popular IoT vendors increasingly supporting Matter in consumer IoT products, we perform a systematic study to investigate how and whether vendors can integrate Matter securely into IoT systems and how well Matter as a standard supports vendors’ secure integration.

By analyzing Matter development model in the wild, we reveal a new kind of design flaw in user-facing Matter control capabilities and interfaces, called UMCCI flaws, which are exploitable vulnerabilities in the design space and seriously jeopardize necessary control and surveillance capabilities of Matter-enabled devices for IoT users. Therefore we built an automatic tool called UMCCI Checker, enhanced by the large-language model in UI analysis, which enables automatically detecting UMCCI flaws without relying on real IoT devices. Our tool assisted us with studying and performing proof-of-concept attacks on 11 real Matter devices of 8 popular vendors to confirm that the UMCCI flaws are practical and common. We reported UMCCI flaws to related vendors, which have been acknowledged by CSA, Apple, Tuya, Aqara, etc. To help CSA and vendors better understand and avoid security flaws in developing and integrating IoT standards like Matter, we identify two categories of root causes and propose immediate fix recommendations.

View More Papers

“I’m 73, you can’t expect me to have multiple...

Ashley Sheil (Munster Technological University), Jacob Camilleri (Munster Technological University), Michelle O Keeffe (Munster Technological University), Melanie Gruben (Munster Technological University), Moya Cronin (Munster Technological University) and Hazel Murray (Munster Technological University)

Read More

Cross-Origin Web Attacks via HTTP/2 Server Push and Signed...

Pinji Chen (Tsinghua University), Jianjun Chen (Tsinghua University & Zhongguancun Laboratory), Mingming Zhang (Zhongguancun Laboratory), Qi Wang (Tsinghua University), Yiming Zhang (Tsinghua University), Mingwei Xu (Tsinghua University), Haixin Duan (Tsinghua University)

Read More

SIGuard: Guarding Secure Inference with Post Data Privacy

Xinqian Wang (RMIT University), Xiaoning Liu (RMIT University), Shangqi Lai (CSIRO Data61), Xun Yi (RMIT University), Xingliang Yuan (University of Melbourne)

Read More

IoT Software Updates: User Perspectives in the Context of...

S. P. Veed, S. M. Daftary, B. Singh, M. Rudra, S. Berhe (University of the Pacific), M. Maynard (Data Independence LLC) F. Khomh (Polytechnique Montreal)

Read More