Heng Li (Huazhong University of Science and Technology), Zhiyuan Yao (Huazhong University of Science and Technology), Bang Wu (Huazhong University of Science and Technology), Cuiying Gao (Huazhong University of Science and Technology), Teng Xu (Huazhong University of Science and Technology), Wei Yuan (Huazhong University of Science and Technology), Xiapu Luo (The Hong Kong Polytechnic University)

Adversarial example techniques have been demonstrated to be highly effective against Android malware detection systems, enabling malware to evade detection with minimal code modifications. However, existing adversarial example techniques overlook the process of malware generation, thus restricting the applicability of adversarial example techniques. In this paper, we investigate piggybacked malware, a type of malware generated in bulk by piggybacking malicious code into popular apps, and combine it with adversarial example techniques. Given a malicious code segment (i.e., a rider), we can generate adversarial perturbations tailored to it and insert them into any carrier, enabling the resulting malware to evade detection. Through exploring the mechanism by which adversarial perturbation affects piggybacked malware code, we propose an adversarial piggybacked malware generation method, which comprises three modules: Malicious Rider Extraction, Adversarial Perturbation Generation, and Benign Carrier Selection. Extensive experiments have demonstrated that our method can efficiently generate a large volume of malware in a short period, and significantly increase the likelihood of evading detection. Our method achieved an average attack success rate (ASR) of 88.3% on machine learning-based detection models (e.g., Drebin and MaMaDroid), and an ASR of 76% and 92% on commercial engines Microsoft and Kingsoft, respectively. Furthermore, we have explored potential defenses against our adversarial piggybacked malware.

View More Papers

Careful About What App Promotion Ads Recommend! Detecting and...

Shang Ma (University of Notre Dame), Chaoran Chen (University of Notre Dame), Shao Yang (Case Western Reserve University), Shifu Hou (University of Notre Dame), Toby Jia-Jun Li (University of Notre Dame), Xusheng Xiao (Arizona State University), Tao Xie (Peking University), Yanfang Ye (University of Notre Dame)

Read More

Poster: Understanding User Acceptance of Privacy Labels: Barriers and...

Jingwen Yan (Clemson University), Mohammed Aldeen (Clemson University), Jalil Harris (Clemson University), Kellen Grossenbacher (Clemson University), Aurore Munyaneza (Texas Tech University), Song Liao (Texas Tech University), Long Cheng (Clemson University)

Read More

All your (data)base are belong to us: Characterizing Database...

Kevin van Liebergen (IMDEA Software Institute), Gibran Gomez (IMDEA Software Institute), Srdjan Matic (IMDEA Software Institute), Juan Caballero (IMDEA Software Institute)

Read More

Poster: FORESIGHT, A Unified Framework for Threat Modeling and...

ChaeYoung Kim (Seoul Women's University), Kyounggon Kim (Naif Arab University for Security Sciences)

Read More