Seyed Ali Ghazi Asgar, Narasimha Reddy (Texas A&M University)

The Internet of Things (IoT) is experiencing exponential growth, with projections estimating over 29 billion devices by 2027. These devices often have limited resources, necessitating the use of lightweight communication protocols. MQTT is a widely used protocol in the IoT domain, but defective security configurations can pose significant risks for the users. In this work, we classify the most commonly used open-source IoT applications that utilize MQTT as their primary communication protocol and evaluate the associated attack scenarios. Our analysis shows that home automation IoT applications have the highest number of exposed devices. In addition, our examination suggests that tracking applications are prone to higher risks as the normalized percentage of exposed devices for this category is 6.85% while only 2.91% of home automation devices are exposed. To tackle these issues, we developed a lightweight, opensource exposure detection system suitable for both computerbased clients and ESP32 microcontrollers. This system warns the users of compromised MQTT broker which enhances the overall security in IoT deployments without any significant overhead.

View More Papers

Insights from GitHub Community on the Matter Standard: Developer...

Muhammad Hassan (University of Illinois Urbana Champaign), Carl Gunter (University of Illinois Urbana Champaign), Susan Landau (Tufts University), Masooda Bashir (University of Illinois Urbana Champaign)

Read More

A New PPML Paradigm for Quantized Models

Tianpei Lu (The State Key Laboratory of Blockchain and Data Security, Zhejiang University), Bingsheng Zhang (The State Key Laboratory of Blockchain and Data Security, Zhejiang University), Xiaoyuan Zhang (The State Key Laboratory of Blockchain and Data Security, Zhejiang University), Kui Ren (The State Key Laboratory of Blockchain and Data Security, Zhejiang University)

Read More

Sheep's Clothing, Wolf's Data: Detecting Server-Induced Client Vulnerabilities in...

Fangming Gu (Institute of Information Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences), Qingli Guo (Institute of Information Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences), Jie Lu (Institute of Computing Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences), Qinghe Xie (Institute of Information Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences), Beibei Zhao (Institute of Information Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences), Kangjie Lu (University of Minnesota),…

Read More