Lea Duesterwald (Carnegie Mellon University), Ian Yang (Carnegie Mellon University), Norman Sadeh (Carnegie Mellon University)

Human actions or lack thereof contribute to a large majority of cybersecurity incidents. Traditionally, when looking for advice on cybersecurity questions, people have turned to search engines or social sites like Reddit. The rapid adoption of chatbot technologies is offering a potentially more direct way of getting similar advice. Initial research suggests, however, that while chatbot answers to common cybersecurity questions tend to be fairly accurate, they may not be very effective as they often fall short on other desired qualities such as understandability, actionability, or motivational power. Research in this area thus far has been limited to the evaluation by researchers themselves on a small number of synthetic questions. This article reports on what we believe to be the first in situ evaluation of a cybersecurity Question Answering (QA) assistant. We also evaluate a prompt engineered to help the cybersecurity QA assistant generate more effective answers. The study involved a 10-day deployment of a cybersecurity QA assistant in the form of a Chrome extension. Collectively, participants (N=51) evaluated answers generated by the assistant to over 1,000 cybersecurity questions they submitted as part of their regular day-to-day activities. The results suggest that a majority of participants found the assistant useful and often took actions based on the answers they received. In particular, the study indicates that prompting successfully improved the effectiveness of answers and, in particular, the likelihood that users follow their recommendations (fraction of participants who actually followed the advice was 0.514 with prompting vs. 0.402 without prompting, p=4.61E-04), an impact on people’s actual behavior. We provide a detailed analysis of data collected in this study, discuss their implications, and outline next steps in the development and deployment of effective cybersecurity QA assistants that offer the promise of changing actual user behavior and of reducing human-related security incidents.

View More Papers

NodeMedic-FINE: Automatic Detection and Exploit Synthesis for Node.js Vulnerabilities

Darion Cassel (Carnegie Mellon University), Nuno Sabino (IST & CMU), Min-Chien Hsu (Carnegie Mellon University), Ruben Martins (Carnegie Mellon University), Limin Jia (Carnegie Mellon University)

Read More

What Are Brands Telling You About Smishing? A Cross-Industry...

Dev Vikesh Doshi (California State University San Marcos), Mehjabeen Tasnim (California State University San Marcos), Fernando Landeros (California State University San Marcos), Chinthagumpala Muni Venkatesh (California State University San Marcos), Daniel Timko (Emerging Threats Lab / Smishtank.com), Muhammad Lutfor Rahman (California State University San Marcos)

Read More

AI-Assisted RF Fingerprinting for Identification of User Devices in...

Aishwarya Jawne (Center for Connected Autonomy & AI, Florida Atlantic University), Georgios Sklivanitis (Center for Connected Autonomy & AI, Florida Atlantic University), Dimitris A. Pados (Center for Connected Autonomy & AI, Florida Atlantic University), Elizabeth Serena Bentley (Air Force Research Laboratory)

Read More

Automated Expansion of Privacy Data Taxonomy for Compliant Data...

Yue Qin (Indiana University Bloomington & Central University of Finance and Economics), Yue Xiao (Indiana University Bloomington & IBM Research), Xiaojing Liao (Indiana University Bloomington)

Read More