Harry Halpin (Nym Technologies)

With the ascendance of artificial intelligence (AI), one of the largest problems facing privacy-enhancing technologies (PETs) is how they can successfully counter-act the large-scale surveillance that is required for the collection of data–and metadata–necessary for the training of AI models. While there has been a flurry of research into the foundations of AI, the field of privacy-enhancing technologies still appears to be a grabbag of techniques without an overarching theoretical foundation. However, we will point to the potential unification of AI and PETS via the concepts of signal and noise, as formalized by informationtheoretic metrics like entropy. We overview the concept of entropy (“noise”) and its applications in both AI and PETs. For example, mixnets can be thought of as noise-generating networks, and so the inverse of neural networks. Then we defend the use of entropy as a metric to compare both different PETs, as well as both PETs and AI systems.

View More Papers

Evaluating Machine Learning-Based IoT Device Identification Models for Security...

Eman Maali (Imperial College London), Omar Alrawi (Georgia Institute of Technology), Julie McCann (Imperial College London)

Read More

Space Cybersecurity Testbed: Fidelity Framework, Example Implementation, and Characterization

Jose Luis Castanon Remy, Caleb Chang, Ekzhin Ear, Shouhuai Xu (University of Colorado Colorado Springs (UCCS))

Read More

ABElity: Attribute Based Encryption for Securing RIC Communication in...

K Sowjanya (Indian Institute of Technology Delhi), Rahul Saini (Eindhoven University of Technology), Dhiman Saha (Indian Institute of Technology Bhilai), Kishor Joshi (Eindhoven University of Technology), Madhurima Das (Indian Institute of Technology Delhi)

Read More

cozy: Comparative Symbolic Execution for Binary Programs

Caleb Helbling, Graham Leach-Krouse, Sam Lasser, Greg Sullivan (Draper)

Read More