Frank Capobianco (The Pennsylvania State University), Quan Zhou (The Pennsylvania State University), Aditya Basu (The Pennsylvania State University), Trent Jaeger (The Pennsylvania State University, University of California, Riverside), Danfeng Zhang (The Pennsylvania State University, Duke University)

Correct access control enforcement is a critical foundation for data security. The reference monitor is the key component for enforcing access control, which is supposed to provide tamperproof mediation of all security-sensitive operations. Since reference monitors are often deployed in complex software handling a wide variety of operation requests, such as operating systems and server programs, a question is whether reference monitor implementations may have flaws that prevent them from achieving these requirements. In the past, automated analyses detected flaws in complete mediation. However, researchers have not yet developed methods to detect flaws that may tamper with the reference monitor, despite the many vulnerabilities found in such programs. In this paper, we develop TALISMAN, an automated analysis for detecting flaws that may tamper the execution of reference monitor implementations. At its core, TALISMAN implements a precise information flow integrity analysis to detect violations that may tamper the construction of authorization queries. TALISMAN applies a new, relaxed variant of noninterference that eliminates several spurious implicit flow violations. TALISMAN also provides a means to vet expected uses of untrusted data in authorization using endorsement. We apply TALISMAN on three reference monitor implementations used in the Linux Security Modules framework, SELinux, AppArmor, and Tomoyo, verifying 80% of the arguments in authorization queries generated by these LSMs. Using TALISMAN, we also found vulnerabilities in how pathnames are used in authorization by Tomoyo and AppArmor allowing adversaries to circumvent authorization. TALISMAN shows that tamper analysis of reference monitor implementations can automatically verify many cases and also enable the detection of critical flaws.

View More Papers

Low-Quality Training Data Only? A Robust Framework for Detecting...

Yuqi Qing (Tsinghua University), Qilei Yin (Zhongguancun Laboratory), Xinhao Deng (Tsinghua University), Yihao Chen (Tsinghua University), Zhuotao Liu (Tsinghua University), Kun Sun (George Mason University), Ke Xu (Tsinghua University), Jia Zhang (Tsinghua University), Qi Li (Tsinghua University)

Read More

Untangle: Multi-Layer Web Server Fingerprinting

Cem Topcuoglu (Northeastern University), Kaan Onarlioglu (Akamai Technologies), Bahruz Jabiyev (Northeastern University), Engin Kirda (Northeastern University)

Read More

Group-based Robustness: A General Framework for Customized Robustness in...

Weiran Lin (Carnegie Mellon University), Keane Lucas (Carnegie Mellon University), Neo Eyal (Tel Aviv University), Lujo Bauer (Carnegie Mellon University), Michael K. Reiter (Duke University), Mahmood Sharif (Tel Aviv University)

Read More

SOCs lead AI adoption: Transitioning Lessons to the C-Suite

Eric Dull, Drew Walsh, Scott Riede (Deloitte and Touche)

Read More