Yusra Elbitar (CISPA Helmholtz Center for Information Security), Alexander Hart (CISPA Helmholtz Center for Information Security), Sven Bugiel (CISPA Helmholtz Center for Information Security)

Rationales offer a method for app developers to convey their permission needs to users. While guidelines and recommendations exist on how to request permissions, developers have the creative freedom to design and phrase these rationales. In this work, we explore the characteristics of real-world rationales and how their building blocks affect users' permission decisions and their evaluation of those decisions. Through an analysis of 720 sentences and 428 screenshots of rationales from the top apps of Google Play, we identify the various phrasing and design elements of rationales. Subsequently, in a user study involving 960 participants, we explore how different combinations of phrasings impact users' permission decision-making process. By aligning our insights with established recommendations, we offer actionable guidelines for developers, aiming to make rationales a usable security instrument for users.

View More Papers

Can a Cybersecurity Question Answering Assistant Help Change User...

Lea Duesterwald (Carnegie Mellon University), Ian Yang (Carnegie Mellon University), Norman Sadeh (Carnegie Mellon University)

Read More

“Do We Call Them That? Absolutely Not.”: Juxtaposing the...

Alexandra Klymenko (Technical University of Munich), Stephen Meisenbacher (Technical University of Munich), Luca Favaro (Technical University of Munich), and Florian Matthes (Technical University of Munich)

Read More

Onion Franking: Abuse Reports for Mix-Based Private Messaging

Matthew Gregoire (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill), Margaret Pierce (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill), Saba Eskandarian (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill)

Read More