Meng Shen (Beijing Institute of Technology), Jiangyuan Bi (Beijing Institute of Technology), Hao Yu (National University of Defense Technology), Zhenming Bai (Beijing Institute of Technology), Wei Wang (Xi'an Jiaotong University), Liehuang Zhu (Beijing Institute of Technology)

Commercial DNN services have been developed in the form of machine learning as a service (MLaaS). To mitigate the potential threats of adversarial examples, various detection methods have been proposed. However, the existing methods usually require access to details or the training dataset of the target model, which is commonly unavailable in MLaaS scenarios. Their detection accuracy experiences a significant drop in a setting where neither the details nor the training dataset of the target model can be acquired.

In this paper, we propose Falcon, an adversarial example detection method offered by a third party, which achieves accuracy and efficiency simultaneously. Based on the disparity in noise tolerance between clean and adversarial examples, we explore constructive noise that cannot affect the model’s output labels when added to clean examples while causing noticeable changes in model outputs when added to adversarial examples. For each input, Falcon generates constructive noise with a specific distribution and intensity and achieves detection through differences in the output of the target model before and after adding constructive noise. Extensive experiments are conducted on 4 public datasets to evaluate the performance of Falcon in detecting 10 typical attacks. Falcon outperforms SOTA detection methods with the highest True Positive Rate (TPR) of adversarial examples and the lowest False Positive Rate (FPR) of clean examples. Furthermore, Falcon achieves a TPR of about 80% with an FPR of 5% on 6 well-known commercial DNN services, which outperforms the SOTA methods. Falcon can also maintain its accuracy although the adversary has complete knowledge of the detection details.

View More Papers

PhyFuzz: Detecting Sensor Vulnerabilities with Physical Signal Fuzzing

Zhicong Zheng (Zhejiang University), Jinghui Wu (Zhejiang University), Shilin Xiao (Zhejiang University), Yanze Ren (Zhejiang University), Chen Yan (Zhejiang University), Xiaoyu Ji (Zhejiang University), Wenyuan Xu (Zhejiang University)

Read More

STIP: Three-Party Privacy-Preserving and Lossless Inference for Large Transformers...

Mu Yuan (The Chinese University of Hong Kong), Lan Zhang (University of Science and Technology of China), Yihang Cheng (University of Science and Technology of China), Miao-Hui Song (University of Science and Technology of China), Guoliang Xing (The Chinese University of Hong Kong), Xiang-Yang Li (University of Science and Technology of China)

Read More

Vibenix: An AI Assistant for Software Packaging with Nix

Martin Schwaighofer (Johannes Kepler University Linz), Martim Monis (INESC-ID and IST, University of Lisbon), Nuno Saavedra (INESC-ID and IST, University of Lisbon), Joao F. Ferreira (INESC-ID and Faculty of Engineering, University of Porto), Rene Mayrhofer (Johannes Kepler University Linz)

Read More