Meng Wang (CISPA Helmholtz Center for Information Security), Philipp Görz (CISPA Helmholtz Center for Information Security), Joschua Schilling (CISPA Helmholtz Center for Information Security), Keno Hassler (CISPA Helmholtz Center for Information Security), Liwei Guo (University of Electronic Science and Technology), Thorsten Holz (Max Planck Institute for Security and Privacy), Ali Abbasi (CISPA Helmholtz Center for Information Security)

Detecting business logic vulnerabilities is a critical challenge in software security. These flaws come from mistakes in an application’s design or implementation and allow attackers to trigger unintended application behavior. Traditional fuzzing sanitizers for dynamic analysis excel at finding vulnerabilities related to memory safety violations but largely fail to detect business logic vulnerabilities, as these flaws require understanding application-specific semantic context. Recent attempts to infer this context, due to their reliance on heuristics and non-portable language features, are inherently brittle and incomplete. As business logic vulnerabilities constitute a majority (27 of the CWE Top 40) of the most dangerous software weaknesses in practice, this is a worrying blind spot of existing tools.

In this paper, we tackle this challenge with ANOTA, a novel human-in-the-loop sanitizer framework. ANOTA introduces a lightweight, user-friendly annotation system that enables users to directly encode their domain-specific knowledge as lightweight annotations that define an application’s intended behavior. A runtime execution monitor then observes program behavior, comparing it against the policies defined by the annotations, thereby identifying deviations that indicate vulnerabilities. To evaluate the effectiveness of ANOTA, we combine ANOTA with a state-of-the-art fuzzer and compare it against other popular bug finding methods compatible with the same targets. The results show that ANOTA+FUZZER outperforms them in terms of effectiveness. More specifically, ANOTA+FUZZER can successfully reproduce 43 known vulnerabilities, and discovered 22 previously unknown vulnerabilities (17 CVEs assigned) during the evaluation. These results demonstrate that ANOTA provides a practical and effective approach for uncovering complex business logic flaws often missed by traditional security testing techniques.

View More Papers

From Awareness to Practice: A Survey of U.S. Users’...

Ece Gumusel (University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign), Yueru Yan (Indiana University Bloomington), Ege Otenen (Indiana University Bloomington)

Read More

Was My Data Used for Training? Membership Inference in...

Xue Tan (Fudan University), Hao Luan (Fudan University), Mingyu Luo (Fudan University), Zhuyang Yu (Fudan University), Jun Dai (Worcester Polytechnic Institute), Xiaoyan Sun (Worcester Polytechnic Institute), Ping Chen (Fudan University)

Read More

NeuroStrike: Neuron-Level Attacks on Aligned LLMs

Lichao Wu (Technical University of Darmstadt), Sasha Behrouzi (Technical University of Darmstadt), Mohamadreza Rostami (Technical University of Darmstadt), Maximilian Thang (Technical University of Darmstadt), Stjepan Picek (University of Zagreb & Radboud University), Ahmad-Reza Sadeghi (Technical University of Darmstadt)

Read More