Jim Alves-Foss, Varsha Venugopal (University of Idaho)

The effectiveness of binary analysis tools and techniques is often measured with respect to how well they map to a ground truth. We have found that not all ground truths are created equal. This paper challenges the binary analysis community to take a long look at the concept of ground truth, to ensure that we are in agreement with definition(s) of ground truth, so that we can be confident in the evaluation of tools and techniques. This becomes even more important as we move to trained machine learning models, which are only as useful as the validity of the ground truth in the training.

View More Papers

SoK: A Proposal for Incorporating Gamified Cybersecurity Awareness in...

June De La Cruz (INSPIRIT Lab, University of Denver), Sanchari Das (INSPIRIT Lab, University of Denver)

Read More

Interpretable Federated Transformer Log Learning for Cloud Threat Forensics

Gonzalo De La Torre Parra (University of the Incarnate Word, TX, USA), Luis Selvera (Secure AI and Autonomy Lab, The University of Texas at San Antonio, TX, USA), Joseph Khoury (The Cyber Center For Security and Analytics, University of Texas at San Antonio, TX, USA), Hector Irizarry (Raytheon, USA), Elias Bou-Harb (The Cyber Center For…

Read More

NC-Max: Breaking the Security-Performance Tradeoff in Nakamoto Consensus

Ren Zhang (Nervos), Dingwei Zhang (Nervos), Quake Wang (Nervos), Shichen Wu (School of Cyber Science and Technology, Shandong University), Jan Xie (Nervos), Bart Preneel (imec-COSIC, KU Leuven)

Read More

“Mind your own cryptocurrency!”

Abbas Acar, Ege Tekiner, Selcuk Uluagac (Florida International University)

Read More