Jim Alves-Foss, Varsha Venugopal (University of Idaho)

The effectiveness of binary analysis tools and techniques is often measured with respect to how well they map to a ground truth. We have found that not all ground truths are created equal. This paper challenges the binary analysis community to take a long look at the concept of ground truth, to ensure that we are in agreement with definition(s) of ground truth, so that we can be confident in the evaluation of tools and techniques. This becomes even more important as we move to trained machine learning models, which are only as useful as the validity of the ground truth in the training.

View More Papers

Demo #9: Dynamic Time Warping as a Tool for...

Mars Rayno (Colorado State University) and Jeremy Daily (Colorado State University)

Read More

A Study on Security and Privacy Practices in Danish...

Asmita Dalela (IT University of Copenhagen), Saverio Giallorenzo (Department of Computer Science and Engineering - University of Bologna), Oksana Kulyk (ITU Copenhagen), Jacopo Mauro (University of Southern Denmark), Elda Paja (IT University of Copenhagen)

Read More

“So I Sold My Soul“: Effects of Dark Patterns...

Oksana Kulyk (ITU Copenhagen), Willard Rafnsson (IT University of Copenhagen), Ida Marie Borberg, Rene Hougard Pedersen

Read More

Interpretable Federated Transformer Log Learning for Cloud Threat Forensics

Gonzalo De La Torre Parra (University of the Incarnate Word, TX, USA), Luis Selvera (Secure AI and Autonomy Lab, The University of Texas at San Antonio, TX, USA), Joseph Khoury (The Cyber Center For Security and Analytics, University of Texas at San Antonio, TX, USA), Hector Irizarry (Raytheon, USA), Elias Bou-Harb (The Cyber Center For…

Read More