Jim Alves-Foss, Varsha Venugopal (University of Idaho)

The effectiveness of binary analysis tools and techniques is often measured with respect to how well they map to a ground truth. We have found that not all ground truths are created equal. This paper challenges the binary analysis community to take a long look at the concept of ground truth, to ensure that we are in agreement with definition(s) of ground truth, so that we can be confident in the evaluation of tools and techniques. This becomes even more important as we move to trained machine learning models, which are only as useful as the validity of the ground truth in the training.

View More Papers

DRIVETRUTH: Automated Autonomous Driving Dataset Generation for Security Applications

Raymond Muller (Purdue University), Yanmao Man (University of Arizona), Z. Berkay Celik (Purdue University), Ming Li (University of Arizona) and Ryan Gerdes (Virginia Tech)

Read More

Binary Mutation Analysis of Tests Using Reassembleable Disassembly

Navid Emamdoost (University of Minnesota), Vaibhav Sharma (University of Minnesota), Taejoon Byun (University of Minnesota), Stephen McCamant (University of Minnesota)

Read More

WIP: Infrastructure-Aided Defense for Autonomous Driving Systems: Opportunities and...

Yunpeng Luo (UC Irvine), Ningfei Wang (UC Irvine), Bo Yu (PerceptIn), Shaoshan Liu (PerceptIn) and Qi Alfred Chen (UC Irvine)

Read More

HARPO: Learning to Subvert Online Behavioral Advertising

Jiang Zhang (University of Southern California), Konstantinos Psounis (University of Southern California), Muhammad Haroon (University of California, Davis), Zubair Shafiq (University of California, Davis)

Read More