Jim Alves-Foss, Varsha Venugopal (University of Idaho)

The effectiveness of binary analysis tools and techniques is often measured with respect to how well they map to a ground truth. We have found that not all ground truths are created equal. This paper challenges the binary analysis community to take a long look at the concept of ground truth, to ensure that we are in agreement with definition(s) of ground truth, so that we can be confident in the evaluation of tools and techniques. This becomes even more important as we move to trained machine learning models, which are only as useful as the validity of the ground truth in the training.

View More Papers

It Doesn’t Have to Be So Hard: Efficient Symbolic...

Vaibhav Sharma (University of Minnesota), Navid Emamdoost (University of Minnesota), Seonmo Kim (University of Minnesota), Stephen McCamant (University of Minnesota)

Read More

Similarity Metric Method for Binary Basic Blocks of Cross-Instruction...

Xiaochuan Zhang (Artificial Intelligence Research Center, National Innovation Institute of Defense Technology), Wenjie Sun (State Key Laboratory of Mathematical Engineering and Advanced Computing), Jianmin Pang (State Key Laboratory of Mathematical Engineering and Advanced Computing), Fudong Liu (State Key Laboratory of Mathematical Engineering and Advanced Computing), Zhen Ma (State Key Laboratory of Mathematical Engineering and Advanced…

Read More

PASS: A System-Driven Evaluation Platform for Autonomous Driving Safety...

Zhisheng Hu (Baidu Security), Junjie Shen (UC Irvine), Shengjian Guo (Baidu Security), Xinyang Zhang (Baidu Security), Zhenyu Zhong (Baidu Security), Qi Alfred Chen (UC Irvine) and Kang Li (Baidu Security)

Read More