Shushang Wen (School of Cyber Science and Technology, University of Science and Technology of China), Yiming Zhang (Tsinghua University), Yuxiang Shen (School of Cyber Science and Technology, University of Science and Technology of China), Bingyu Li (School of Cyber Science and Technology, Beihang University), Haixin Duan (Tsinghua University; Zhongguancun Laboratory), Jingqiang Lin (School of Cyber Science and Technology, University of Science and Technology of China)

Email clients that support auto-configuration mechanisms automatically retrieve server configuration information, such as the hostname, port number, and connection type, allowing users to log in by simply entering email addresses and passwords. Auto-configuration mechanisms are being increasingly adopted. However, the security implications of these mechanisms, both in terms of implementation and deployment, have not yet been thoroughly studied. In this paper, we present the first systematic analysis of security threats associated with email auto-configuration and evaluate their impacts. We summarize 10 attack scenarios, covering 17 defects (including 8 newly identified ones), along with 4 inadequate client UI notifications. These attack scenarios can either cause a victim to connect to an attacker-controlled server or establish an insecure connection, putting the victim’s credentials at risk. Moreover, our large-scale measurements and in-depth analysis revealed serious insecurity of auto-configuration applications in the wild. On the server-side, we discovered 49,013 domains, including 19 of the Top-1K popular domains, were misconfigured. On the client-side, 22 out of 29 clients were vulnerable to those threats. Moreover, 27 out of 29 clients exhibited at least one UI-notification defect that facilitates silent attacks. These defects arise from misconfiguration, mismanagement, flawed implementation and compatibility. We hope this paper raises attention to email auto-configuration security.

View More Papers

DiStefano: Decentralized Infrastructure for Sharing Trusted Encrypted Facts and...

Sofia Celi (Brave Software), Alex Davidson (NOVA LINCS & Universidade NOVA de Lisboa), Hamed Haddadi (Imperial College London & Brave Software), Gonçalo Pestana (Hashmatter), Joe Rowell (Information Security Group, Royal Holloway, University of London)

Read More

On Borrowed Time – Preventing Static Side-Channel Analysis

Robert Dumitru (Ruhr University Bochum and The University of Adelaide), Thorben Moos (UCLouvain), Andrew Wabnitz (Defence Science and Technology Group), Yuval Yarom (Ruhr University Bochum)

Read More

OrbID: Identifying Orbcomm Satellite RF Fingerprints

Cédric Solenthaler (ETH Zurich), Joshua Smailes (University of Oxford), Martin Strohmeier (armasuisse Science & Technology)

Read More

ReDAN: An Empirical Study on Remote DoS Attacks against...

Xuewei Feng (Tsinghua University), Yuxiang Yang (Tsinghua University), Qi Li (Tsinghua University), Xingxiang Zhan (Zhongguancun Lab), Kun Sun (George Mason University), Ziqiang Wang (Southeast University), Ao Wang (Southeast University), Ganqiu Du (China Software Testing Center), Ke Xu (Tsinghua University)

Read More