Jaewon Hur (Seoul National University), Juheon Yi (Nokia Bell Labs, Cambridge, UK), Cheolwoo Myung (Seoul National University), Sangyun Kim (Seoul National University), Youngki Lee (Seoul National University), Byoungyoung Lee (Seoul National University)

Sharing training data for deep learning raises critical concerns about data leakage, as third-party AI developers take full control over the data once it is handed over to them. The problem becomes even worse if the model trained using the data should be returned to the third-party AI developers - e.g., healthcare startup training its own model using the medical data rented from a hospital. In this case, the malicious developers can easily leak the training data through the model as he can construct an arbitrary data flow between them - e.g., directly encoding raw training data into the model, or stealthily biasing the model to resemble the training data. However, current model training frameworks do not provide any protection to prevent such training data leakage, allowing the untrusted AI developers to leak the data without any restriction.

This paper proposes DLBox, a new model training framework to minimize the attack vectors raised by untrusted AI developers. Since it is infeasible to completely prevent data leakage through the model, the goal of DLBox is to allow only a benign model training such that the data leakage through invalid paths are minimized. The key insight of DLBox is that the model training is a statistical process of learning common patterns from a dataset. Based on it, DLBox defines DGM-Rules, which determine whether a model training code from a developer is benign or not. Then, DLBox leverages confidential computing to redesign current model training framework, enforcing only DGM-Rules-based training. Therefore, untrusted AI developers are strictly limited to obtain only the benignly trained model, prohibited from intentionally leaking the data. We implemented the prototype of DLBox on PyTorch with AMD SEV-SNP, and demonstrated that DLBox eliminates large attack vectors by preventing previous attacks (e.g., data encoding, and gradient inversion) while imposing minimal performance overhead.

View More Papers

CounterSEVeillance: Performance-Counter Attacks on AMD SEV-SNP

Stefan Gast (Graz University of Technology), Hannes Weissteiner (Graz University of Technology), Robin Leander Schröder (Fraunhofer SIT, Darmstadt, Germany and Fraunhofer Austria, Vienna, Austria), Daniel Gruss (Graz University of Technology)

Read More

Evaluating the Strength and Availability of Multilingual Passphrase Authentication

Chi-en Amy Tai (University of Waterloo), Urs Hengartner (University of Waterloo), Alexander Wong (University of Waterloo)

Read More

Mnemocrypt

André Pacteau, Antonino Vitale, Davide Balzarotti, Simone Aonzo (EURECOM)

Read More

SIGuard: Guarding Secure Inference with Post Data Privacy

Xinqian Wang (RMIT University), Xiaoning Liu (RMIT University), Shangqi Lai (CSIRO Data61), Xun Yi (RMIT University), Xingliang Yuan (University of Melbourne)

Read More