Mathias Oberhuber (Graz University of Technology), Martin Unterguggenberger (Graz University of Technology), Lukas Maar (Graz University of Technology), Andreas Kogler (Graz University of Technology), Stefan Mangard (Graz University of Technology)

Software-based power side-channel attacks are a significant security threat to modern computer systems, enabling adversaries to extract confidential information. Existing attacks typically exploit direct power signals from dedicated interfaces, as demonstrated in the PLATYPUS attack, or power-dependent timing variations, as in the case of the Hertzbleed attack. As access to direct power signals is meanwhile restricted on more and more platforms, an important question is whether other exploitable power-related signals exist beyond timing proxies.

In this paper, we show that Android mobile devices expose numerous power-related signals that allow power side-channel attacks. We systematically analyze unprivileged sensors provided by the Android sensor framework on multiple devices and show that these sensors expose parasitic influences of the power consumption. Our results include new insights into Android sensor leakage, particularly a novel leakage primitive: the rotation dependent power leakage of the geomagnetic rotation vector sensor. We extensively evaluate the exposed sensors for different information leakage types. We compare them with the corresponding ground truth, achieving correlations greater than 0.9 for some of our tested sensors. In extreme cases, we observe not only statistical results but also, e.g., changes in a compass app’s needle by approximately 30° due to CPU stress. Additionally, we evaluate the capabilities of our identified leakage primitives in two case studies: As a remote attacker via the Google Chrome web browser and as a local attacker running inside an installed app. In particular, we present an end-to-end pixel-stealing attack on different Android devices that effectively circumvents the browser’s cross-origin isolation with a leakage rate of 5 - 10 s per pixel. Lastly, we demonstrate a proof-of-concept AES attack, leaking individual key bytes using our newly discovered leakage primitive.

View More Papers

Characterizing the Impact of Audio Deepfakes in the Presence...

Magdalena Pasternak (University of Florida), Kevin Warren (University of Florida), Daniel Olszewski (University of Florida), Susan Nittrouer (University of Florida), Patrick Traynor (University of Florida), Kevin Butler (University of Florida)

Read More

NodeMedic-FINE: Automatic Detection and Exploit Synthesis for Node.js Vulnerabilities

Darion Cassel (Carnegie Mellon University), Nuno Sabino (IST & CMU), Min-Chien Hsu (Carnegie Mellon University), Ruben Martins (Carnegie Mellon University), Limin Jia (Carnegie Mellon University)

Read More

How Different Tokenization Algorithms Impact LLMs and Transformer Models...

Ahmed Mostafa, Raisul Arefin Nahid, Samuel Mulder (Auburn University)

Read More

I know what you MEME! Understanding and Detecting Harmful...

Yong Zhuang (Wuhan University), Keyan Guo (University at Buffalo), Juan Wang (Wuhan University), Yiheng Jing (Wuhan University), Xiaoyang Xu (Wuhan University), Wenzhe Yi (Wuhan University), Mengda Yang (Wuhan University), Bo Zhao (Wuhan University), Hongxin Hu (University at Buffalo)

Read More