Chen Chen (Texas A&M University, USA), Zaiyan Xu (Texas A&M University, USA), Mohamadreza Rostami (Technische Universitat Darmstadt, Germany), David Liu (Texas A&M University, USA), Dileep Kalathil (Texas A&M University, USA), Ahmad-Reza Sadeghi (Technische Universitat Darmstadt, Germany), Jeyavijayan (JV) Rajendran (Texas A&M University, USA)

Processor designs rely on iterative modifications and reuse well-established designs. However, this reuse of prior designs also leads to similar vulnerabilities across multiple processors. As processors grow increasingly complex with iterative modifications, efficiently detecting vulnerabilities from modern processors is critical. Inspired by software fuzzing, hardware fuzzing has recently demonstrated its effectiveness in detecting processor vulnerabilities. Yet, to our best knowledge, existing processor fuzzers fuzz each design individually, lacking the capability to understand known vulnerabilities in prior processors to fine-tune fuzzing to identify similar or new variants of vulnerabilities.

To address this gap, we present ReFuzz, an adaptive fuzzing framework that leverages contextual bandit to reuse highly effective tests from prior processors to fuzz a processor-undertest (PUT) within a given ISA. By intelligently mutating tests that trigger vulnerabilities in prior processors, ReFuzz detects similar and new variants of vulnerabilities in PUTs. ReFuzz uncovered three new security vulnerabilities and two new functional bugs. ReFuzz detected one vulnerability by reusing a test that triggers a known vulnerability in a prior processor. One functional bug exists across three processors that share design modules. The second bug has two variants. Additionally, ReFuzz reuses highly effective tests to enhance efficiency in coverage, achieving an average 511.23× coverage speedup and up to 9.33% more total coverage, compared to existing fuzzers.

View More Papers

How to Effectively Trace Provenance on Windows Endpoint Detection...

Jason Liu (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign), Muhammad Adil Inam (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign), Akul Goyal (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign), Dylen Greenenwald (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign), Adam Bates (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign), Saurav Chittal (Purdue University)

Read More

On the Difficulty of Selecting Few-Shot Examples for Effective...

Md Abdul Hannan (Colorado State University), Ronghao Ni (Carnegie Mellon University), Chi Zhang (Carnegie Mellon University), Limin Jia (Carnegie Mellon University), Ravi Mangal (Colorado State University), Corina S. Pasareanu (Carnegie Mellon University)

Read More

Insights from GitHub Community on the Matter Standard: Developer...

Muhammad Hassan (University of Illinois Urbana Champaign), Carl Gunter (University of Illinois Urbana Champaign), Susan Landau (Tufts University), Masooda Bashir (University of Illinois Urbana Champaign)

Read More