Nimish Mishra (Department of Computer Science and Engineering, IIT Kharagpur), Anirban Chakraborty (Department of Computer Science and Engineering, IIT Kharagpur), Debdeep Mukhopadhyay (Department of Computer Science and Engineering, IIT Kharagpur)

The ever-increasing growth of Internet-of-Things (IoT) has led to wide-scale deployment of high-frequency, highly complex Systems-on-a-Chip (SoCs), which are capable of running a full-fledged operating system (OS). The presence of OS and other software countermeasures make SoCs resilient against the traditional fault attacks that are relevant on FPGAs and microprocessors. In this work, we present the first practical implications of targeting an orthogonal aspect of SoC's architecture: the system bus. We inject electromagnetic pulses onto the system bus during the execution of instructions involving processor-memory interaction. We show how address bus faults compromise software implementations of masked implementations of ciphers, illustrated using implementations of state-of-the-art post-quantum cryptography (PQC) schemes, leaking entire secret keys with a single fault. We also demonstrate that data bus faults can be controlled and exploited to launch Differential Fault Analysis (DFA) attacks on table-based implementation of the Advanced Encryption Standard (AES). Furthermore, we demonstrate that the impact of such bus faults can be far-reaching and mislead the security guarantees of the popular and widely used ARM TrustZone. We use data-bus faults (along with loopholes in the GlobalPlatform API specification) to mislead the signature verification step to load a malicious Trusted Application (TA) inside the TrustZone. We follow this up with address bus faults to steal symmetric encryption keys of other benign TAs in the system, leading to complete breakdown of security on TrustZone. We note that since the attack relies upon loopholes in the GlobalPlatform API specification, it is portable to any TEE following this specification. To emphasize upon this portability of the attack, we demonstrate successful installation of malicious TAs on two TrustZone implementations (OP-TEE and MyTEE) on two different platforms (Raspberry Pi 3 and Raspberry Pi 4). Finally, we propose countermeasures that can be integrated into the SoC environment to defend against these attack vectors.

View More Papers

EM Eye: Characterizing Electromagnetic Side-channel Eavesdropping on Embedded Cameras

Yan Long (University of Michigan), Qinhong Jiang (Zhejiang University), Chen Yan (Zhejiang University), Tobias Alam (University of Michigan), Xiaoyu Ji (Zhejiang University), Wenyuan Xu (Zhejiang University), Kevin Fu (Northeastern University)

Read More

Detecting Voice Cloning Attacks via Timbre Watermarking

Chang Liu (University of Science and Technology of China), Jie Zhang (Nanyang Technological University), Tianwei Zhang (Nanyang Technological University), Xi Yang (University of Science and Technology of China), Weiming Zhang (University of Science and Technology of China), NengHai Yu (University of Science and Technology of China)

Read More

Facilitating Non-Intrusive In-Vivo Firmware Testing with Stateless Instrumentation

Jiameng Shi (University of Georgia), Wenqiang Li (Independent Researcher), Wenwen Wang (University of Georgia), Le Guan (University of Georgia)

Read More

UntrustIDE: Exploiting Weaknesses in VS Code Extensions

Elizabeth Lin (North Carolina State University), Igibek Koishybayev (North Carolina State University), Trevor Dunlap (North Carolina State University), William Enck (North Carolina State University), Alexandros Kapravelos (North Carolina State University)

Read More