Rei Yamagishi, Shinya Sasa, and Shota Fujii (Hitachi, Ltd.)

Codes automatically generated by large-scale language models are expected to be used in software development. A previous study verified the security of 21 types of code generated by ChatGPT and found that ChatGPT sometimes generates vulnerable code. On the other hand, although ChatGPT produces different output depending on the input language, the effect on the security of the generated code is not clear. Thus, there is concern that non-native English-speaking developers may generate insecure code or be forced to bear unnecessary burdens. To investigate the effect of language differences on code security, we instructed ChatGPT to generate code in English and Japanese, each with the same content, and generated a total of 450 codes under six different conditions. Our analysis showed that insecure codes were generated in both English and Japanese, but in most cases they were independent of the input language. In addition, the results of validating the same content in different programming languages suggested that the security of the code tends to depend on the security and usability of the API provided by the programming language of the output.

View More Papers

Architecting Trigger-Action Platforms for Security, Performance and Functionality

Deepak Sirone Jegan (University of Wisconsin-Madison), Michael Swift (University of Wisconsin-Madison), Earlence Fernandes (University of California San Diego)

Read More

Designing and Evaluating a Testbed for the Matter Protocol:...

Ravindra Mangar (Dartmouth College) Jingyu Qian (University of Illinois), Wondimu Zegeye (Morgan State University), Abdulrahman AlRabah, Ben Civjan, Shalni Sundram, Sam Yuan, Carl A. Gunter (University of Illinois), Mounib Khanafer (American University of Kuwait), Kevin Kornegay (Morgan State University), Timothy J. Pierson, David Kotz (Dartmouth College)

Read More

dRR: A Decentralized, Scalable, and Auditable Architecture for RPKI...

Yingying Su (Tsinghua university), Dan Li (Tsinghua university), Li Chen (Zhongguancun Laboratory), Qi Li (Tsinghua university), Sitong Ling (Tsinghua University)

Read More