Hongwei Wu (Purdue University), Jianliang Wu (Simon Fraser University), Ruoyu Wu (Purdue University), Ayushi Sharma (Purdue University), Aravind Machiry (Purdue University), Antonio Bianchi (Purdue University)

Vendors are often provided with updated versions of a piece of software, fixing known security issues.
However, the inability to have any guarantee that the provided patched software does not break the functionality of its original version often hinders patch deployment.
This issue is particularly severe when the patched software is only provided in its compiled binary form.
In this case, manual analysis of the patch's source code is impossible, and existing automated patch analysis techniques, which rely on source code, are not applicable.
Even when the source code is accessible, the necessity of binary-level patch verification is still crucial, as highlighted by the recent XZ Utils backdoor.

To tackle this issue, we propose VeriBin, a system able to compare a binary with its patched version and determine whether the patch is ''Safe to Apply'', meaning it does not introduce any modification that could potentially break the functionality of the original binary.
To achieve this goal, VeriBin checks functional equivalence between the original and patched binaries.
In particular, VeriBin first uses symbolic execution to systematically identify patch-introduced modifications.
Then, it checks if the detected patch-introduced modifications respect specific properties that guarantee they will not break the original binary's functionality.
To work without source code, VeriBin's design solves several challenges related to the absence of semantic information (removed during the compilation process) about the analyzed code and the complexity of symbolically executing large functions precisely.
Our evaluation of VeriBin on a dataset of 86 samples shows that it achieves an accuracy of 93.0% with no false positives, requiring only minimal analyst input.
Additionally, we showcase how VeriBin can be used to detect the recently discovered XZ Utils backdoor.

View More Papers

Secure Transformer Inference Made Non-interactive

Jiawen Zhang (Zhejiang University), Xinpeng Yang (Zhejiang University), Lipeng He (University of Waterloo), Kejia Chen (Zhejiang University), Wen-jie Lu (Zhejiang University), Yinghao Wang (Zhejiang University), Xiaoyang Hou (Zhejiang University), Jian Liu (Zhejiang University), Kui Ren (Zhejiang University), Xiaohu Yang (Zhejiang University)

Read More

Securing BGP ASAP: ASPA and other Post-ROV Defenses

Justin Furuness (University of Connecticut), Cameron Morris (University of Connecticut), Reynaldo Morillo (University of Connecticut), Arvind Kasiliya (University of Connecticut), Bing Wang (University of Connecticut), Amir Herzberg (University of Connecticut)

Read More

Compiled Models, Built-In Exploits: Uncovering Pervasive Bit-Flip Attack Surfaces...

Yanzuo Chen (The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology), Zhibo Liu (The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology), Yuanyuan Yuan (The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology), Sihang Hu (Huawei Technologies), Tianxiang Li (Huawei Technologies), Shuai Wang (The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology)

Read More

ProvGuard: Detecting SDN Control Policy Manipulation via Contextual Semantics...

Ziwen Liu (Beihang University), Jian Mao (Beihang University; Tianmushan Laboratory; Hangzhou Innovation Institute, Beihang University), Jun Zeng (National University of Singapore), Jiawei Li (Beihang University; National University of Singapore), Qixiao Lin (Beihang University), Jiahao Liu (National University of Singapore), Jianwei Zhuge (Tsinghua University; Zhongguancun Laboratory), Zhenkai Liang (National University of Singapore)

Read More