Yunyi Zhang (Tsinghua University), Shibo Cui (Tsinghua University), Baojun Liu (Tsinghua University), Jingkai Yu (Tsinghua University), Min Zhang (National University of Defense Technology), Fan Shi (National University of Defense Technology), Han Zheng (TrustAl Pte. Ltd.)

LLM applications (i.e., LLM apps) leverage the powerful capabilities of LLMs to provide users with customized services, revolutionizing traditional application development. While the increasing prevalence of LLM-powered applications provides users with unprecedented convenience, it also brings forth new security challenges. For such an emerging ecosystem, the security community lacks sufficient understanding of the LLM application ecosystem, especially regarding the capability boundaries of the applications themselves.

In this paper, we systematically analyzed the new development paradigm and defined the concept of the LLM app capability space. We also uncovered potential new risks beyond jailbreak that arise from ambiguous capability boundaries in real-world scenarios, namely, capability downgrade and upgrade. To evaluate the impact of these risks, we designed and implemented an LLM app capability evaluation framework, LLMApp-Eval. First, we collected application metadata across 4 platforms and conducted a cross-platform ecosystem analysis. Then, we evaluated the risks for 199 popular applications among 4 platforms and 6 open-source LLMs. We identified that 178 (89.45%) potentially affected applications, which can perform tasks from more than 15 scenarios or be malicious. We even found 17 applications in our study that executed malicious tasks directly, without applying any adversarial rewriting. Furthermore, our experiments also reveal a positive correlation between the quality of prompt design and application robustness. We found that well-designed prompts enhance security, while poorly designed ones can facilitate abuse. We hope our work inspires the community to focus on the real-world risks of LLM applications and foster the development of a more robust LLM application ecosystem.

View More Papers

Towards Bridging the Telemetry Gap for Security Applications in...

Haohuang Wen (The Ohio State University and SE-RAN.ai), Vinod Yegneswaran (SRI and SE-RAN.ai), Phillip Porras (SRI and SE-RAN.ai), Ashish Gehani (SRI and SE-RAN.ai), Prakhar Sharma (SRI and SE-RAN.ai), Zhiqiang Lin (The Ohio State University and SE-RAN.ai)

Read More

On the Security Risks of Memory Adaptation and Augmentation...

Hocheol Nam (KAIST), Daehyun Lim (KAIST), Huancheng Zhou (Texas A&M University), Guofei Gu (Texas A&M University), Min Suk Kang (KAIST)

Read More

What Are Brands Telling You About Smishing? A Cross-Industry...

Dev Vikesh Doshi (California State University San Marcos), Mehjabeen Tasnim (California State University San Marcos), Fernando Landeros (California State University San Marcos), Chinthagumpala Muni Venkatesh (California State University San Marcos), Daniel Timko (Emerging Threats Lab / Smishtank.com), Muhammad Lutfor Rahman (California State University San Marcos)

Read More