Rui Zhu (Indiana University Bloominton), Di Tang (Indiana University Bloomington), Siyuan Tang (Indiana University Bloomington), Zihao Wang (Indiana University Bloomington), Guanhong Tao (Purdue University), Shiqing Ma (University of Massachusetts Amherst), XiaoFeng Wang (Indiana University Bloomington), Haixu Tang (Indiana University, Bloomington)

Most existing methods to detect backdoored machine learning (ML) models take one of the two approaches: trigger inversion (aka. reverse engineer) and weight analysis (aka. model diagnosis). In particular, the gradient-based trigger inversion is considered to be among the most effective backdoor detection techniques, as evidenced by the TrojAI competition, Trojan Detection Challenge and backdoorBench. However, little has been done to understand why this technique works so well and, more importantly, whether it raises the bar to the backdoor attack. In this paper, we report the first attempt to answer this question by analyzing the change rate of the backdoored model's output around its trigger-carrying inputs. Our study shows that existing attacks tend to inject the backdoor characterized by a low change rate around trigger-carrying inputs, which are easy to capture by gradient-based trigger inversion. In the meantime, we found that the low change rate is not necessary for a backdoor attack to succeed: we design a new attack enhancement method called Gradient Shaping (GRASP), which follows the opposite direction of adversarial training to reduce the change rate of a backdoored model with regard to the trigger, without undermining its backdoor effect. Also, we provide a theoretic analysis to explain the effectiveness of this new technique and the fundamental weakness of gradient-based trigger inversion. Finally, we perform both theoretical and experimental analysis, showing that the GRASP enhancement does not reduce the effectiveness of the stealthy attacks designed to evade the backdoor detection methods based on weight analysis, as well as other backdoor mitigation methods without using detection.

View More Papers

SigmaDiff: Semantics-Aware Deep Graph Matching for Pseudocode Diffing

Lian Gao (University of California Riverside), Yu Qu (University of California Riverside), Sheng Yu (University of California, Riverside & Deepbits Technology Inc.), Yue Duan (Singapore Management University), Heng Yin (University of California, Riverside & Deepbits Technology Inc.)

Read More

Modeling and Detecting Internet Censorship Events

Elisa Tsai (University of Michigan), Ram Sundara Raman (University of Michigan), Atul Prakash (University of Michigan), Roya Ensafi (University of Michigan)

Read More

WIP: A Trust Assessment Method for In-Vehicular Networks using...

Artur Hermann, Natasa Trkulja (Ulm University - Institute of Distributed Systems), Anderson Ramon Ferraz de Lucena, Alexander Kiening (DENSO AUTOMOTIVE Deutschland GmbH), Ana Petrovska (Huawei Technologies), Frank Kargl (Ulm University - Institute of Distributed Systems)

Read More

Automatic Adversarial Adaption for Stealthy Poisoning Attacks in Federated...

Torsten Krauß (University of Würzburg), Jan König (University of Würzburg), Alexandra Dmitrienko (University of Wuerzburg), Christian Kanzow (University of Würzburg)

Read More